Review teams – consisting of contractors known as quality 'qualifiers'- comb through web sites and other content to mark questionable items such as pornography. Now Google has added a new category, 'upset-offensive,' in its guidelines for its evaluators of 10,000 dear quality around the world. For example, content with 'extremely offensive terminology or racial slurs' could now get marked as such. While marksomething does not directly affect the own results, used to adjust thesoftware company that best content ranks higher. The changes werereported in the blog search engine land. Paul Haahr, one of which is involved with the quality of search, Google engineers said the site demonstrably incorrect information 'we are explicitly avoid the term 'false news', because we believe that it is too vague.', however, we wantwhite.' guidelines, 160 pages, which are an interesting look at how Google ranks the quality of its search results. 'As a search quality evaluator, they will work in many different types of degree projects,' begins. For example, it gives examples of 'high quality' pages, as the pageof a newspaper that has 'won seven Pulitzer prizes Award', and 'low quality' pages, as an article that includes 'many grammar and punctuation errors.' the guidelines cite an example of 'History of the Holocaust' as a search query. Get marked a web site that lists 'Top 10 reasonswhy the Holocaust did not happen'. A blog that Angela Merkel is theguide of another example addresses (sic) daughter of Adolph Hitler."This LP is a blog that presents a conspiracy theory unsupported facts that Angela Merkel is the daughter of Adolph Hitler ', says.' because the MC is inaccurate and misleading, completely fails the intentionof the user, even if the subject of the page matches the query," says the Guide, adding ' a more useful for this query result can confirm that Adolf Hitler had no children , or provide information about the daughter of Hitler by Jackie French.' the new flag of the ' offensive of disgust to ' instructs quality raters to the ' flag all web results containingcontent offensive or annoying from the perspective of the users in your area, even if the result meets the intent of the user. " The Internetcontains all types of content, including content that many users findoffensive or upsetting,' says Google Guide.' in addition, users of all ages, genders, races, and religions use the Internet to understand theworld and points of view of others. ' Users can issue queries about sensitive issues to understand why people believe, say, or do things that are annoying or offensive. ' Search engines exist to allow users to find the information you are looking for information 'Please assign theflag of UpsettingOffensive all web results containing content offensive or annoying from the perspective of the users in your area, even if the result meets the intent of the user.' so even if the results are that the person seeks to such as white supremacist web sites, it could stillget marked. But this does not mean that the results will not be at allwhen someone searches for them. Google has about 10,000 qualifiers from quality contractors around the world that evaluated the search results. Qualifiers are real searches to perform, of real searches thatGoogle sees. Then rate of pages that appear on the first results in terms of how good these look like answers. Quality raters do not have the power to alter the results from Google directly. On the other hand, the data produced by the evaluators of the quality are used toimprove Google's search algorithms in general. At the time, that datacould have an impact on pages of low quality that are seen by the evaluators as well as others that were not reviewed. Quality raters useda set of guidelines that are almost 200 pages, instructing them on how to assess the quality of the web site, and if the results review the needs of those who could find particular queries. SUPPRESSION OF CONTENT FROM GOOGLE
According to the Guide updated, seen by search engine land, Googleis directed: content that promotes hate or violence against a group of persons on the basis of criteria including (but not limited to) race orethnicity, religion, gender, nationality or citizenship, disability, age, sexual orientation or veteran status. Contents very offensive terminology or racial insults. Graphic violence, including abuse animal cruelty orchild. Explicit as information
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar